« Council Winners Times Four | Main | Afterthoughts »

Presenting al-Qaeda

It wasn’t a work of joy. On occasion, there are things that should, or rather must, be done.

On Friday evening, Bill Roggio and I began discussing a presentation that to the two of us, clearly fit into this category. Our effort was to document, in a visual manner, al-Qaeda’s attacks since 1998 when the International Islamic Front declared war on you, me, and all those who refuse their radical view of Islam.

The result is a presentation available at Winds of Change.NET in the form of a Flash presentation.

It documents 30 attacks by al-Qaeda and its IIF affiliates since February of 1998. It by no means includes all al-Qaeda attacks during that time. Or all acts of terrorism. Instead, it’s a presentation of select acts of violence in 16 different countries and at the cost of thousands of lives. 4895 lives lost. More than 12345 wounded. As Bill notes in the accompanying post at Winds, many of the victims of al-Qaeda’s terrorism are Muslim. Whether they are collateral damage or purposefully targeted, given al-Qaeda’s ideological intolerance, is not as significant as the response of those under attack.

It’s that thought that remains with me at this hour after completing the presentation. When attacked, we have responded and altered the plans of Sheikh bin Laden and his band of falsely righteous cohorts. Soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines have fallen in the battle to defend us, and the world, against an enemy all too comfortable with indiscriminate killing. Like many of you, and our nations leaders, I’m confident that we can (and will) win the war. That being the case, I can’t help but believe that those who sit by and watch while their religion is abducted for pure evil, while their sons and daughters are taught that death is preferred to life, and that it is morally excusable to commit acts of terrorism are the key to ending the war sooner rather than later, and at a lower cost in lives and turmoil. There are many Muslims who stand with us against al-Qaeda and the IIF. More are needed.

While on the subject, I’ll note that the musical accompaniment for the presentation is in Arabic. It’s title is Mohammad al-Mustafa or Mohammad the Chosen One. It wasn’t selected to stir the pot, so to speak, or to enflame the passions of those who will disagree with our editorial perspectives on the war or any other matter. It was simply a moving piece that, from my perspective at least, speaks volumes in Arabic and should reinforce a desire to see Islam no longer held captive by terrorist. To the ear unaccustomed to Arabic it is simple, resonating and perhaps somewhat haunting.

When looking at the data presented, it is minimal and without commentary or editorial opinion, as much as possible. Tell us what you think; provide the editorial commentary on your blog or in the comments section here or at Winds.

And to close, I’d like to thank Bill for the opportunity. As he notes, we shared a vision and the effort. We struggled with the content and its weight in sheer loss and strife. In the end, more importantly, we share a vision for the end of the war, for life without terrorism and for the role, even when insignificant, that we can play in helping to get the message out. That is a joy.

(Originally posted at The Fourth Rail.)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://littleredblog.com/cms/refer.cgi/694

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Presenting al-Qaeda:

» It's really quite simple from Bittersweet
There is no excuse for it nor is there any moral equivalency. Terrorism doesn't deserve appeasement, nor understanding. All it deserves and all we should offer it, is the total commitment to eradicate it and those who practice it from the face of o... [Read More]

Comments (2)

We have dial-up so it took forever to load...not a complaint, just an indication of my level of interest. I don't usually bother but I figured anything you guys did would be worth seeing. And it was.

The music is exactly right. I'd wondered where it came from...

Here's something I've been thinking about all day, though: I compare this awfulness with the annual traffic fatalities in this country alone and I begin to see why people simply don't pay attention. It's as though their freedom to ignore it, thank you, is correlated somehow with the unconscious appraisal of the risks of daily life.

How many people died in traffic accidents in the US on 7/7? After the gory news splash don't people simply absorb it and continue on?

These aren't rhetorical questions...I'm really wondering about the equations.

It's a good analogy dymphna

In a traffic accident which we have all seen we have that initial moment of horror and sadness. It's easy to be desensitized because after all it doesn't really affect us after the shock wears off

The difference is that with terrorism being desensitized is nothing more than kidding yourself yet so many choose to be so.

Every attack affects us whether we were directly involved or not. We all like to say that we can’t and won’t allow the attacks to change us or our way of life but they do. Our laws change, our perceptions change, our reactions change etc etc.

I’m rambling here when in fact all I really want to say is I see your point and isn’t it sad when the thought of a person laden with explosives and intent on murdering us has become yet another factor to consider in the course of our daily routines?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About:

Presenting al-Qaeda:

This page contains a single entry posted on July 11, 2005 11:40 PM.

The previous entry was Council Winners Times Four.

The next entry is Afterthoughts.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Licensed

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Credits: