« April 2005 | Main | June 2005 »

May 2005 Archives

May 27, 2005

Yudhoyono's Challenge

The War on Terror has seen a number of nations in transition from enemy to ally of the United States. In Afghanistan and Iraq, despotic rulers were removed, and following first every free elections new leaders have expressed support for continued U.S. involvement and assistance in their evolution toward democratic success, even if they aren’t pro-American in the fuller sense of the term. Elsewhere, there are states in transition from foe to friend. For some, the War on Terror has provided the necessity for such a change. For others the War on Terror also presents a challenge to making the transition.

Indonesia’s newly elected President Yudhoyono, faces many significant challenges in his efforts to improve relations with the U.S. And while he has found success thus far, some of these challenges are worth review.

Foremost among the challenges facing Yudhoyono, leading the world’s largest Muslim population while allied with the U.S. in the War on Terror. This is in no means an indictment of Indonesia’s Muslim population, in large part one of the more liberal in the world. Rather it is due to the existence of Jemaah Islamiyat (J.I.), an al-Qaeda linked terror organization in Indonesia. The prosecution of the War on Terror will not cease so long as this group remains a threat, and for Yudhoyono it remains both a political challenge and a tactical challenge to eliminate J.I.

A constraint earned prior to Yudhoyono’s election is also found in Indonesia’s history of military abuse of power and influence. While not limited to the post Suharto era, Indonesian military forces have not shown restraint in their efforts to quash unrest and independence movements among the various islands that make up the nation post Suharto. Added to the political might the military has maintained historically, it is no wonder that few are eager to see any aggressive action from Jakarta. In many respects, the history of corruption and abuse of power not only limits Yudhoyono’s ability to confront terrorist, it also limits his ability to move rapidly in other reform initiatives. For that reason, I hold that it will not be during Yudhoyono’s presidency that that foreign viewers consider many of Indonesia’s issues resolved. How’s that? Frankly, it’ll take a few turns at the ballot, and significant reform in the command and control of the armed forces to ensure outsiders that the historical relationship between the military power structure and the civilian government are no longer symbiotic.

Additionally, Yudhoyono must revitalize the economy of Indonesia. The nation faces significant infrastructure, education and banking difficulties that limit investors’ willingness to seek out opportunities in Indonesia. Indonesia has also become a net oil importer rather exporter, and coupled with government pricing controls this has severely limited the positives that many nations have found while oil prices have soared.

Yudhoyono’s economic policy’s, termed "pro-growth, pro-job, pro-poor", are essentially aimed at addressing the need for greater transparency in business and encouraging foreign investment to reduce unemployment and stem corruption. Again, however, time and frankness will be the immediate determinants of progress, more so than the resumption of talks such as the Trade and Investment Council. The one significant positive, although I’m hesitant to call it one, is in the rebuilding efforts following last December’s devastating tsunami. Both from an infrastructure perspective and in broader terms of addressing unemployment, the potential for a lift to the economy exist. If wise, Yudhoyono will work to ensure that the needed accountability is given for all foreign aid received, as this may go help to establish some level of confidence in his programs of reform.

Yudhoyono is an optimist. In that regard, he and President Bush are akin. In his visit with President Bush, Yudhoyono told Bush that the economic reforms are underway and that his military is undergoing the fundamental changes needed to end its history of transgressions. Bush believed him - "[t]he president told me he's in the process of reforming the military, and I believe him."

From an outsiders view, it appears that they have cause for their optimism. Likewise both are moving with relative caution, which I would applaud. Given the significance of the Strait of Malacca to international shipping, and Chinese efforts (link includes map of shipping routes) to extend their influence in the region, the U.S. will need an optimist and a strong batch of allies. More so, we’ll need a free and economically stable Indonesia to thwart the violent tactics, and ideology, of al-Qaeda from taking further root in Indonesia. Along with Australia, India and Japan, the U.S. should be both an economic and military friend to Indonesia.

[Originally posted at The Fourth Rail.]

The Council Has Spoken!

Per the weekly direction of the Watcher of Weasels, the Watcher's Council has once again met and voted on the best blogging of the week.

In a close vote, all the entries were excellent, the winning council entry is MSM - MIA or AWOL? from Gates of Vienna. It's a troubling tale of post 3/11 events in Spain and a must read.

The winning non-council entry, Blood and Justice, from Indepundit is beyond description. Just read it.

And for the full results visit the Watcher of Weasels.

May 25, 2005

Being Bashar

Bashar Assad is in quite a pickle. Having come to power following the death of his father, the Middle East should have been an ideal place for a young totalitarian just learning the ropes. Unfortunately for Bashar he has neither his father’s Machiavellian mastery of politicking, nor the luxury of coming to power an age void of geopolitical focus on other parts of the world, such as the Cold War provided. With the successful U.S. War on Terror just miles from his home, the Arab street becoming more self critical - desirous of self governance and empowered by support from afar, Bashar has found himself forced to withdraw from Lebanon and now sits isolated and fermenting under the eyes of the world.

This week we learned that Syria has "severed all links" to the U.S. military and CIA in Iraq. Much as I would have responded, the U.S. seems to have given this announcement a collective "yawn." Why? Because Syria was never an ally in the War on Terror and their "minimal and sporadic" assistance was an attempt to quiet the criticism of newly free Iraq and U.S. commanders dealing with Syria's either porous border or direct support for the terrorists crossing it.

Popular, in as much as enough discussion has been made to qualify as popular, theories for why Syria has cut its minimal assistance to U.S. operations range from the conspiratorial – Zarqawi being recently injured and running to Syria needing cover; to the openly outlandish – Syria needs to cut ties before moving their forces into place for an attack. I don't subscribe to either, and will offer alternative reasoning. I'll be the first to admit that sufficient data isn't available to support any theory or to predict the next step - unless we believe that Imad Mustapha, Syria's ambassador to the U.S., was telling the truth and Syria just didn't see the point in helping if they are going to be criticized so harshly, poor things.

The two reasons for cutting off aid are: 1) Given the unrest brewing in Syria, a first for Syria, Assad recognized the need to ensure that Islamists don’t refocus their attention on his government – freshly under attack from moderate and secular Muslims; and 2) Assad just doesn't understand that his government, like that of Mubarak in Egypt, needs to embrace the West for support (many Westerners still preferring stability) rather than breaking ties and waiting on the eventual eye of the storm to hit Damascus.

These two reasons leave out the Kurds in Syria, a large and well organized group certainly displeased with the state of affairs in Syria, emboldened by the success of the Kurds in Iraq, and not satisfied by recent concessions such as the establishment of the a government council to deal with Kurd issues. Daily Star writer Ibrahim Hamidi believes the Kurds hold the key to Syria's future, or perhaps to the future of the Assad regime.

While Hamidi may place an extra significance on the Kurd influence, I would grant that the Kurds are influential and not ignored when Assad looks at his future options. Unfortunately, the real key is Assad's unwillingness to separate from Iran. Until he does, Syria will not be free to explore "slow" advancement in self governance, nor will they be able to address U.S. concerns about Syria’s influence in Lebanon (even without the military presence), or support for terrorists in Iraq (or Israel and the Palestinian Territories).

My advice to Bashar:

Break your ties to Iran and implement the process of moving towards becoming a modern and free nation, or else you will eventually face the rapid end to your significance in Syria.

[Originally posted at The Fourth Rail.]

Passing the Baton

Paulie passed the baton to me. He responded for Bunker. And Bunker responded for Bogie. As do I. Feel free to completely ignore this post, as I wish I had been able to ignore the request.

Total volume of music files on my computer: Zero.

The last CD I bought: Chris Issac - Forever Blue (for my grandmother)

Song playing now: None. Hannity is on the radio at the moment.

Five songs I listen to a lot, or that mean a lot to me: Annie Mae - John Lee Hooker; Glory Box - Protishead; Trip Like I Do - Crystal Method; You Never Can Tell - Chuck Berry; Ring of Fire - Johnny Cash

Five people to whom I'm passing the baton: The remainder of the bloggers at Conserva-Puppies.

Media Slander

It would have been, to all involved, better if it weren’t necessary. And then along comes Linda Foley advancing yet another series of slanderous accusations against the men and women of our armed forces. In response, a team of bloggers has once again formed an alliance to ensure that the truth is told about those who claim to report truth for a living.

Media Slander, formed by Bill Roggio, Blackfive, Brian Scott, Charles Goggin, Kevin Craver, LaShawn Barber, Mike Krempasky, Roger Morrow, USMC_Vet, Winds of Change.NET, is now up!

Drop by and get the truth behind purposeful acts of slander against those who put their lives in harms way to protect us all.

May 24, 2005

Why Deal?

I’ve read, listened to, and considered arguments both for and against the deal signed yesterday between 14 members of both parties (7 each) in the Senate. And while I will be pleased to see the nominees get a vote, those that will, there remains a nagging feeling that the Republicans have sold us out.

The more I consider the issue, the less I believe it was necessary to deal and I become more convinced that the milder sort of conservative in the Senate failed, again, to uphold their espoused values. In place of values, such as each nominee should be voted on unless in committee or otherwise prevented, we’ve got the idea that compromise – the greatest Senate aspiration by far – supplants conscience.

In the coming days things should move rapidly and some portion of the President’s nominees will get a vote up or down. In the days after, others will continue to be held outside the intent of the Constitution and the threat against others will remain. Put off till tomorrow that which pains you today seems to be the norm.

May 23, 2005

Forsaking Stability

Of our greater virtues one must recognize the end to our acceptance of “the soft bigotry of low expectations” as most significant in the world today. After decades of preferring the stability of the autocrats in the Arab world, the terrible attacks of 9/11 and the President’s unwillingness to count all Muslims among the enemies to the U.S., we are in the midst of a spring of possibilities. Fouad Ajami, writing in the Opinion Journal, describes his meeting with Arab men and women filled with hope, a press opening up for the first time to a critical review of Arab culture and politics, and clearly recognizing that the removal of Saddam Hussein in Iraq led the way to their new hope.

"As I made my way on this Arab journey, I picked up a meditation that Massimo d'Azeglio, a Piedmontese aristocrat who embraced that "springtime" in Europe, offered about his time, which speaks so directly to this Arab time: "The gift of liberty is like that of a horse, handsome, strong, and high-spirited. In some it arouses a wish to ride; in many others, on the contrary, it increases the desire to walk." It would be fair to say that there are many Arabs today keen to walk--frightened as they are by the prospect of the Islamists coming to power and curtailing personal liberties, snuffing out freedoms gained at such great effort and pain. But more Arabs, I hazard to guess, now have the wish to ride. It is a powerful temptation that George W. Bush has brought to their doorstep."

Ajami’s conclusion that while some will accept their new found hope with reserve and a willingness to progress slowly, more will seek the path of haste in their desire to bring the gift of liberty to their children sooner rather than later. Likewise, in our tossing aside the value of stability, we are called to forsake the inclination to judge all Arabs or Muslims as terrorists, enemies of the U.S. or villains waiting on their opportunity to rule with an iron hand.

In this effort, as exemplified by recent comments on this blog, many are thus far incapable of finding a proper balance. One of my personal interests in the War on Terror is in the effort to find metrics for measuring our progress toward victory. As Strategy Page notes in their efforts to do the same, it cannot be done in isolation as events around the world have a significant impact as well, whether in direct conflicts, wars or purely in the realm of diplomacy. As such, we should be prepared to recognize the implications of policy decisions around the world. When we compromise our beliefs to permit WTO membership for a non-democratic state, ignore human rights abuses to avoid potential economic hardship, or acknowledge and accept terrorists as politicians, the Arab people who are now so enthused by the possibility of liberty will recognize the inconsistency. Even if justified by pragmatism, we should recognize that for those with only a hint of liberty knocking at their door, such play is less likely to be understood.

Whether by our valuing liberty above tyranny or the expansion of our own economic interests, we must be willing to forsake stability, risk the turmoil of transition and embrace the potential of others to achieve. In doing so, we tell the Arab hopeful that we will stand by them, should things turn awry, and moreover, we tell the non-Arab that it isn’t by terror alone we are prompted to action… it is by our values.

[Originally posted at The Fourth Rail.]

May 20, 2005

Neither First Nor Last

The words of Linda Foley, President of the Newspaper Guild, are neither the first nor the last to reveal the truth about much of the media’s distorted reality. For the uninitiated, a quick review of Foley’s comments and attempts at cleaning up afterwards.

Last Friday, while speaking before the National Conference for Media Reform, Foley says:

"Journalists are not just being targeted verbally or politically. They are also being targeted for real in places like Iraq. And what outrages me as a representative of journalists is that there's not more outrage about the number and the brutality, and the cavalier nature of the U.S. military toward the killing of journalists in Iraq. I think it's just a scandal."

And...

"It's not just U.S. journalists either, by the way. They target and kill journalists from other countries, particularly Arab countries, at news services like Al Jazeera, for example. They actually target them and blow up their studios, with impunity. This is all part of the culture that it is OK to blame the individual journalists, and it just takes the heat off of these media conglomerates that are part of the problem."

When contacted by Editor & Publisher on Thursday, Foley said:

"I was careful of not saying troops, I said U.S. military. Could I have said it differently? There are 100 different ways of saying this, but I'm not sure they would have appeased the right."

For other responses to Foley’s comments read Blackfive, This isn’t writing, it’s typing, Winds of Change and The Fourth Rail.

As for the Little Red Blog’s view, it’s simple. Foley lives in an alternate reality. In her reality, saying the U.S. military targets journalist doesn’t mean that members of the service, the troops, target journalist. With 100 different ways to say that the U.S. military purposefully and willfully targets journalist, Foley manages to believe that the military isn’t the troops. In her reality there comes a point when a member of the armed forces, formerly known as a troop, becomes part and parcel of the “U.S. military” and is no longer worth supporting. Perhaps it’s when he achieves rank or command, perhaps it’s when he supports the orders of his commander-in-chief, and perhaps we’ll never know. In the odd, and non-existent, reality of Linda Foley, you are a patriot by saying you support the troops, all the while deriding their service, incriminating their character and inciting those who seek to do them harm.

Foley clearly believes that those who are bothered by her statement are just members of the “right.” I would guess she said that with an appropriate level of disgust, the sort that makes you think she had to find the Listerine afterwards. As a member of the “right” it may be that my words are of little value and will be seen as the mere joining of a chorus under the direction of Karl Rove. Even if so, I have a little more to add.

I have not been quick to challenge the patriotism of the media elites who’ve made similar statements, such as Eason Jordan, or of those who’ve clearly taken a position in opposition to current U.S. policy in Iraq. As a general rule, I would rather give someone the benefit of the doubt. But there comes a point, a point when you realize that the language doesn’t mean the same thing to them as it does to you. Being misunderstood, aren’t we all on occasion, is one thing, but saying something until it’s noticed and then dodging the criticism rather than admitting the truth is not an endearing quality. I have a little advice for the next Foley, Jordan, Newsweek, Rather...

If you are a reporter, report the facts, anything else you offer is subject to being ignored, ridiculed and... remembered.

The Council Has Spoken

The Watcher's Council has once again met, voted and with a little help from the Watcher, selected the weekly winners.

The winning council entry - Please Don't Run, Newt - by Right Wing Nut House and the winning non-council entry - I Got Your Desecration Right Here Pal - by Varifrank. You can see the results of the vote at the Watcher of Weasels.

May 19, 2005

Kopel on Florida's Stand Your Ground Law

Way back on April 6th I wrote of my approval and support for Florida’s new so-called “Stand Your Ground Bill” which had just won the approval of Florida’s House and Senate. Today, via Instapundit, I came upon David Kopel’s lengthy look at the details behind the new law.

While I wrote of the more positive moral stance the state takes in this new law, Mr. Kopel’s piece explores the stipulations, the do’s and don’ts, of the law. It’s highly readable, and recommended for those interested in seeing it coming to a state near you.

Change

Starting this blog, almost a year ago, my intent was simple. I wanted a space to express my thoughts on various issues, primarily with regard to politics and international affairs. It turned out that I enjoyed it immensely, and so I did it with ever increasing vigor. Additionally, I found that I was learning a great deal by reading other bloggers and being forced to consider the many various takes on the issues. Yet another win, and another cause to continue. Frankly no other reasons would have been necessary but one more became clear: the community of people, concerned and interested in the state of the nation and world, that makes up the blogosphere. At first, a small group of folks taking the time to comment or email, then expanding to discussions of the issues, better means to express opinion and eventually to never met friends and relationships.

From there I found further encouragement and reach for my ideas, and moreover, I was invited to join in on other efforts. Thus far all have been more than expected. As a frequent reader you know, the most challenging, and significantly responsible for my drop in frequency of blogging, has been the efforts to develop Threats Watch. It has also been most rewarding (even if not yet complete). Most gratifying about it has been discussing the issues with Tom, the Redhunter, and Bill Rice, of By Dawn’s Early Light. That alone would have satisfied me for years to come.

Yet it isn’t the end. Today, Bill Roggio, of The Fourth Rail, announced that he has been invited to join Winds of Change, and as such, he’s making some changes at The Fourth Rail. Most notably (for me), he’s invited Bill Rice and myself to join Justin at The Fourth Rail, complemented by his post on Saturday’s when the Winds of Change shifts focus to post exclusively good news. Read Bill's announcements at The Fourth Rail and Winds of Change for more on the changes in store for him. And be sure and congratulate him, Joe and the Winds of Change team as well.

I’m honored and excited by the opportunity, and looking forward to the challenge of writing for Bill’s audience. If you frequent the site, you’ll recognize that the comments and discussion of Bill’s post are top flight, and that too will be an enjoyable aspect of this new adventure. I invite you to join in the discussion there as well.

Given that The Fourth Rail focuses on the Global War on Terror and issues related to achieving victory over our enemies, little change will occur here. If any, it’ll be that I’ll once again write with the frequency of my earlier months of blogging. And as soon as Tom, Bill Rice and I have completed our initial assessments for Threats Watch, we’ll invite The Fourth Rails readers to help us make it a successful effort as well.

In closing, I’d like to again thank Bill Roggio for the opportunity, and to congratulate him, Joe Katzman, Bill Rice, Justin Blackburn and the entire Winds of Change team.

May 16, 2005

Falling Down

Newsweek, if we give them the benefit of the doubt, made a terrible mistake. If you are, as am I, not so quick to believe Newsweek’s version of the story, then you are left with the realization that Newsweek, its publishers and editors, are at least partly responsible for the death of 15 people.

It is not that I don’t believe Newsweek made an error, I believe the reporting was erroneous, the question for me is whether or not Newsweek knew, in advance of its publication, that the story lacked credibility, would cause an outrage, and would further damage U.S. relations with the Muslim world. It is hard for me to accept that Newsweek’s staff of supposedly worldly journalist and editors weren’t aware of the potential for a story of this nature to become a spark in the tender box that is the Muslim world. I believe they either knew, and were okay with it, or worse, knew and wanted it.

Without any significant knowledge of the Muslim world Newsweek should have known of the cultural propensity to accept false reporting about the U.S. or the west. As such, if we are foolish enough to believe that Newsweek neither understood the potential from such a comment nor recognized the lack of necessity to report baseless and inflammatory accusations, then we too have become like the proverbial Arab street. Thankfully the majority of the U.S. has not made that fall. As for Newsweek, there is no depth great enough to describe their fall.

Winners for the Week

As they do each week, last Thursday the Watcher's Council gathered and voted on the best and the brightest blog entries for the week. The results have been released and are found at the Watcher of Weasels.

The winning council entry comes from Right Wing Nut House, Bush: A Solitary Voice For Remembrance, while the winning non-council entry comes from the American Thinker, Jihad Begot the Crusades. Both were excellent, as were many other of the entries. Take a few minutes and read them.

May 11, 2005

Immigration Reform

Tougher immigration legislation is in the works. Unfortunately it isn’t the U.S.; it’s France that’s addressing illegal immigration. The BBC reports that France has announced new measures to address the issue. Some highlights:

Visas with biometric data;
Tougher deportation regulations;
Increased border controls;
Improved constraints on illegal workers;
Tighter regulations on marriages by French nationals;
And the creation of an immigration police force.

All this and the French only have between 200 and 400 thousand illegals. The French also admitted that their previous amnesty efforts, in 1981 and 1997, where failures and resulted in further illegal immigration. Washington on the other hand remains asleep at the wheel.

More on the Summit

The fine folks at the NY Times (don’t laugh) have published their take on the events in Brasilia. And while the column is largely a regurgitation of the two linked in yesterday's post, its still worth a look. More worthy is Austin Bay’s take on the summit.

As Austin catches, and sorely missing from the previous AP and FT columns, the participants in the summit also expressed their view on terrorism, which the UN hasn’t yet defined.

The Brasilia conference also:

...called for an international conference to define what terrorism is, and endorsed the right of peoples to "resist foreign occupation in accordance with the principle of international legality and in compliance with international humanitarian law."

What will come of the meeting is clear - little of any value aside from a bit more clarity on the scope and scale of anti-American sentiment and moral confusion in both regions.

May 10, 2005

What's A Friendly Little Get Together?

When leaders from the Arab and South American worlds get together to improve relations, economic and otherwise, it’s just a little something to keep an eye on. On Monday, in Brasilia, Brazil, just such a meeting began and thus far it’s produced several noteworthy events. While the stated purpose of the summit, dubbed the Summit of South American-Arab Countries, is to usher in improved political and economic ties between the regions, thus far the group has managed to challenge U.S. sanctions on Syria, question the UK’s claims to the Falkland Islands, and to press the Israeli’s to withdraw from the occupied territories. A few details for the summit that includes 7 Arab heads of state and 8 of their South American counterparts --

The largest ovations by the esteemed leaders and businessmen taking part in the convention have been for Hugo Chavez, there’s a friendly fellow for you, and Mahmoud Abbas. The event's host, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, the first elected leftist leader of Brazil, went on to praise the Palestinian people for their patience. Patience. Palestinian patience. Yup.

In a document to be signed on Thursday, the group asserts that the U.S. violates international law by placing sanctions on Syria, which the U.S. did in response to Syria’s ties to terrorism. The document request that the UK and Argentina return to negotiations over the Falkland Islands, most likely prompted by the EU Constitutional referendum that includes the islands as British overseas territories.

To me it is clear that while efforts to establish "free-trade" between the two regions, as would apply to any or all regions, is an admirable goal. Unfortunately, just as in the hallows of the UN, when the participants only pay lip service to the ideals of freedom, it is unlikely that any positives will be achieved. Of course, in the diplomatic manner appropriate for our age, the U.S. congratulated the participants for their efforts.

May 9, 2005

Over There

Looking the other way is a dangerous move when standing before an enemy. The U.S. has several enemies who require our attention today, and our government seems significantly challenged to keep them all in view. North Korea remains staunchly defiant while toying with nuclear weapons, Iran appears prepared to trash the EU-3 negotiations in favor of a return to uranium enrichment activities, Russia and the EU are moving closer to an agreement which will provide further basis for the former Soviet Union to become a WTO member, and China sits with disdain for Japan, an independent Taiwan and a world unwilling to do without cheap goods built on the back of Chinese laborers.

A friend once said to me that the trouble with the news is there is never anything really happening. After deciding that I might have to rethink whom my friends are, it occurred to me that, at least in the case of this one individual, for some the only news is when the worst has actually occurs. I’m loath to wait for war, the launch of a missile, or the ratification of agreements that are certain to aid the destruction of freedom and liberty before becoming engaged in the debate.

For many, it is enough to pass their time without concern for the larger issues at play, and then to respond with vitriol and misunderstanding when things go in a direction contrary to their benefit. Blogging provides those who choose a different course to have a voice ahead of the event.

All that being said... what’s going on:

In Iran - just a little over a month before their presidential elections, they've officially announced that they’ve converted uranium ore concentrate into uranium tetraflouride gas (UF-4), a step closer to the target uranium hexafloride (UF-6), a key step in the production of highly enriched uranium (HEU) which could be used to develop nuclear weapons. Given how the U.S., among others, have believed that Iran had done so for quite sometime, it is not news, the news is the admission, which is typical of the Iranian practice of admitting critical steps or progress only after significant corollary events have occurred. In this case, one might ask, how much UF-6 or HEU does Iran have if they are now admitting UF-4 production?

Additionally, Iran has once again suggested that their temporary cessation of enrichment activities is likely to end within the next few days. This, of course, would violate the terms of their negotiations with the EU-3, and place the onus on the U.S. and EU to take the issue before the UN Security Council, a step long ago overdue.

With regard to the DPRK – both the U.S. and Japan have responded to the shutdown of the DPRK’s Yongbyon nuclear power plant, and subsequent missile testing with concern. There has been speculation that the DPRK plans to test a nuclear weapon, and as recently as today, the Chosun Ilbo has editorialized that the North may do so as early as June. This while China sits idly by, allowing our interest to focus on North Korea or Iran, and they portray themselves as aghast at Japan’s history books and interested in Taiwan’s opposition parties desire for a united China.

The EU, in their typical fashion, appears to believe that Russia under Putin is ready for WTO membership and is encouraging the Russian’s to sign an agreement with the EU to solidify their credentials for inclusion early next year. The U.S. is apparently not opposed to Russian membership, and why would we be, we supported China’s membership.

Speaking of China, and not of their faux anger over Japan’s history books or their panda bear offering to Taiwan, today China and Pakistan announced they’d co-develop a new fighter jet to replace Pakistan’s aging fleet. Never mind the U.S. offer to sell fighters to Pakistan.

Rant over...

Winners and More Winners Announced

Being behind on my relaying the winners of the Watchers Council, it's time to do so for last week and the week before. I'll start with the most recent winners.

Last week's winning Council entry was Hostages: Time for America to Act by Carpe Bonum, while the non-Council winner was The Great Islamic Warrior: Stewardresses, Elementary Schoolchildren and Wounded Crash Survivors by New Sisyphus. Both were excellent, as were the others, and given how few blogs I've read lately, it was an enjoyable task to read them all. You can find the results of the vote at the Watcher of Weasels.

The previous week's winning Council entry Silence of the Sheep by Gates of Vienna, followed by China's Time Bomb: The Banking System by the Glittering Eye and Russian Revanchism by Right Wing Nut House. The winning non-Council entry was Los Angeles Marketed as Part of Mexico by LA Hispanic Station from the Blue State Conservatives followed by The EU and Arabs IV: War, Oil, EAD by American Future and then Standing on the Wall: An Interview with a Marine Returned from Iraq by ¡Gringo Unleashed!. All of these and the other entries, which received votes, are available at the Watcher of Weasels.

And while at the Watcher's site, you might notice that as the Watcher does each week, once again an offer of free linkage is availed to those willing to step up to the plate. Consider it, and perhaps this week you'll be the winning non-Council entry.

May 5, 2005

In Brief

As of now, I'm feeling a bit behind the eight ball. The new site is in beta, or soft-launched, and technically functioning - but we (myself, Tom and Bill) haven't published our initial assessments, and as such we aren't posting there either. Aside from the selected news updates on the category pages, it's pretty much a static site for the next few days. Although I would say that the select news is getting good reviews, both for our selection or choices, and for the aggregation. If I haven't emailed you to say thanks yet, I will.

Here at the LRB, little to no updates thus far (three) this month, and after March surpassing September and October in number of readers, April was a big downer (little regular blogging). That being said, those who do frequent the LRB seem to keep coming back and thus I remain hopeful that when I return to more regular blogging, someone will notice.

Aside from a couple of house keeping posts that are due, as last weeks winners of the Watcher's Council have to be announced, and later tonight or tomorrow a new set will come, I'll probably not have a great deal to offer again before the weekend. Hopefully, Tom, Bill and I will have completed things at Threats Watch and I can get back to the issues at hand here before Monday. And, of course, next week the Senate will return to session and we'll hopefully be able to discuss the confirmation, or pathway to, of several nominees to the federal bench. And many other things.

May 2, 2005

Sharansky's Exit

One of the foremost minds, hearts and consciences in the world today, Natan Sharansky, author of The Case for Democracy, has resigned from the Israeli government of Ariel Sharon. His letter of resignation, available at Winds of Change, is a must read for those seeking to understand why he would step down at this time. In his own words:

"As you know, I have opposed the disengagement plan from the beginning on the grounds that I believe any concessions in the peace process must be linked to democratic reforms within Palestinian society. Not only does the disengagement plan ignore such reforms, it will in fact weaken the prospects for building a free Palestinian society and at the same time strengthen the forces of terror.

Will our departure from Gaza encourage building a society where freedom of speech is protected, where independent courts protect individual rights, and where free markets enable Palestinians to build an independent economic life beyond government control? Will our departure from Gaza end incitement in the Palestinian media or hate- filled indoctrination in Palestinian schools? Will our departure from Gaza result in the dismantling of terror groups or the dismantling of the refugee camps in which four generations of Palestinians have lived in miserable conditions?

Clearly, the answer to all these questions is no."

There is little that can be said to challenge his assertions here. The withdrawal from the Gaza is a political move. As such, it is not based on principle or character – attributes that Sharansky, his thoughts and actions are bound to. Prime Minister Sharon is acting as a leader, and in this case, his leadership isn’t intended to impact the Israeli people.

From my take, Sharon’s move is aimed at leading the Palestinian people and world opinion. In the absence of positive Arab or Palestinian leadership, particularly in the autocratic nations backing the Palestinian Authority for years under Yassir Arafat and holding the reigns of power with a perverted blend of false piety and ethnic nationalism, the Palestinian people have failed to establish an sense of democratic normalcy or basic systems of supporting life in a free and open society. Their lack of trust in Israel, as well as moderate Palestinian leaders, cannot be modified from within in short order. To hasten the transition, Sharon takes an unpopular course at home.

Sharansky should be applauded for his principles, while the pragmatically minded will also recognize that his stepping down in no way aids his overall objective. Would I have had it that Sharansky stay despite his disagreement with the policy? Probably not, for a man of his character would be hard pressed to be most effective in that role, and yet, I can’t help but believe that had he been willing to accept the political boldness of the plan, and recognize that while nothing is guaranteed, it is leadership by example for a people who’ve known only negative leaders – the Palestinians.

Threats Watch

Well, it isn't 100% done, but it's time to invite a few more readers to check it out.

The new site, Threats Watch, is functional, mostly. We haven't published the initial assessments of the various threats, or posts of any sort other than the initial welcome statement but many of the category pages now have news feeds and resource links attached to them. The current welcome post is on every page, but it'll disappear from them once we start updating the them with assessments or regular post on issues and events.

Check it out, share your feedback here or there. And if you find something that's broken, by all means let me know. Also tell Tom and Bill what you think of it, as they've been instrumental to its development and will have regular updates beginning shortly.

A couple of technical notes - we use a combination of del.icou.us, mySQLicious, and lots of php to feed the news into each page. To select the news and commentary, we are using Feed on Feeds. I highly recommend them all.

May 1, 2005

May Already

Is it May already?

As I get older it does seem that time itself speeds up. May... wow.

Thanks to all those who sent prayers and well wishes for my grandfather. We talked with my grandmother tonight, and have passed on your well wishes to them both.

Tomorrow is May 2. I'll be openning the doors to a new blog/site tomorrow (not sure what time, sorry) and shortly thereafter back to regular and consistent blogging here. Now - back to the task at hand.

About:

May 2005 Archives:

This page contains all entries posted to LRB in May 2005. They are listed from oldest to newest.

April 2005 is the previous archive.

June 2005 is the next archive.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Licensed:

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Credits: