« Email SNAFU | Main | Florida’s Stand Your Ground Bill »

Iran's Nuclear Gamesmanship

On a visit to Paris, Iranian President Mohammad Khatamei expressed his belief that Iran and the EU-3 are closer to an agreement that would permit Iran to maintain its nuclear technology development efforts without further review by the UN Security Council. Khatamei believes that Iran’s latest counter-proposal presented to negotiators last month has been more openly received by the EU-3, particularly France. What was significant about this proposal?

Iran requested that they be permitted to maintain a “pilot” enrichment facility incapable producing enough highly enriched uranium (HEU) for bomb making purposes, and yet, a face saving measure that would maintain Iran’s efforts to understand and master the technology. Why would we oppose such a move, or more specifically, why would I?

The answers are many, so for brevity, I’ll limit my response to a few more on point issues. First up, Iran has not abided by the conditions of the NPT or IAEA inspections as it is obligated to do. That alone gives me much reason to doubt that Iran would abide by any new agreement to limit the scale of its efforts. Additionally, Iran has a contractual obligation to return spent fuel to its initial provider, in this case Russia. The idea that a complete fuel cycle is required for the “understanding” of the technology is a misnomer at best. In the worst case, it is that Iran seeks to understand the cycle so that it may develop nuclear weapons based on the HEU it could ostensibly gain through the use of centrifuges. And then there is the Iranian heavy water reactor near Arak.

Unlike the light water reactors that gain most of the attention, such as the one in Bushehr, the spent fuel from the heavy water reactors is much more readily used for weapons development. The residual spent fuel from light water reactors require the extensive use of centrifuges to collect or create the HEU. Heavy water reactors produce plutonium. The Iranian resistance organization, National Council of Resistance, believes that Arak will be fully operational within two years and will produce 22 pounds of plutonium per year. Iran says the facility is set for completion by 2014 and will be used to develop radio isotopes for medical purposes.

What we know is that Iran has 40 tons of spent fuel that has been processed, prior to their cessation of such activities per their agreement with the EU-3, and that they processed that spent fuel without the approval or supervision of the IAEA or its inspectors. Believing that they’ve done so only to gain the knowledge of how to do it, or to reuse the fuel is not only naïve but potentially deadly.

The Bush administration has my support in its efforts to end the standoff, including the willingness to back the EU-3’s negotiations. That being said, there are many issues that prevent me from being optimistic and there are many conditions that are not, and should not be on the table. Iran must end their enrichment efforts permanently, cease their heavy water reactor efforts, and once and for all open their facilities to full and permanent IAEA oversight. Not likely, and therefore once again I say its time to take the issue to the UN Security Council.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Iran's Nuclear Gamesmanship:

» Submitted for Your Approval from Watcher of Weasels
First off...  any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,  and here.  Die spambots, die!  And now...  here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher's Council for this week's vote. Council link... [Read More]

» The Council Has Spoken! from Watcher of Weasels
First off...  any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,  and here.  Die spambots, die!  And now...  the winning entries in the Watcher's Council vote for this week are China's Time Bombs by The Glitterin... [Read More]

Comments (3)

If the issue is not addressed effectively, I can see Isreal making a move here. They destroyed Iraq's Osirak nuclear research facility near Baghdad in June 7, 1981. The last thing Isreal needs is Iran pointing nuclear bombs at them because the Mullahs are crazy enough to use them. I'm also intereseted in how Bush and US will react to this. As for a global reaction to this .... well, we all know that answer to that.

I am curious as I am not educated on this subject, but does the Security Council currently have any policies in place that provide criteria that would prohibit certain governmental structures from having nuclear plants capable of creating enriched plutonium or is such policy determined case by case?

Marvin [TypeKey Profile Page]:

Charles - the treaties involved, NPT and the related IAEA expanded criteria, determine the level of development that a particular nation may have. Unfortunately the UNSC doesn't have a moral or ethical barometer to permit some and prevent others. Essentially, if you signed the NPT as a non-nuclear state, then you can't develop nukes without violating the NPT.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Blogs of Note:

Better Blogs:


  • Little Red Blog

Also found at:

  • ThreatsWatch

Iran's Nuclear Gamesmanship:

This page contains a single entry posted on April 6, 2005 11:04 AM.

The previous entry was Email SNAFU.

The next entry is Florida’s Stand Your Ground Bill.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.


Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.